I am amazed.

The Society for Endoc­ri­no­logy in the UK recently repor­ted that taking higher doses of thy­ro­xine (which will lower the TSH lab result) may be safer than has been pur­por­ted for decades.

And how low a TSH lab result did they find to be safe? As low as 0.04 – 0.4, the research found, is still safe enough to not cause an inc­rea­sed risk of  “heart disease, abnor­mal heart­beat pat­terns and bone frac­tu­res”, aka HYPERthy­roid symp­toms.

And those of us world­wide who know about the supe­rio­rity of natu­ral desic­ca­ted thy­roid can also use these research results in our fight to be on enough desic­ca­ted thy­roid with TSH-obsessed doc­tors, who view research as the end-all to the truth rather than solid cli­ni­cal pre­sen­ta­tion, sadly. Because when we are on enough desic­ca­ted thy­roid to feel fabu­lous again with all symp­toms remo­ved (in the pre­sence of good cor­ti­sol levels, ade­quate ferri­tin, B12 and diges­tive issues), our TSH lab result is always low, aka sup­pres­sed, and without one iota of hyper symptoms.

Patients have expe­rien­tially known this truth about the lousy TSH lab test, without research, for years!

But here’s what’s mis­sing from their research:

  1. Those “safe, low levels of an “ink spot on a piece of paper” do not mean the 16,426 patients they follo­wed will be without nume­rous issues rela­ted to being on a sto­rage hor­mone.  i.e. the body is not meant to live for con­ver­sion alone! A healthy thy­roid will con­vert T4 to the active T3, but it will also pro­vide direct T3 in addi­tion to the T2, T1 and calcitonin…none of which a T4-only med pro­vi­des directly.
  2. Addi­tio­nally, the TSH lab test only reveals the action of a pitui­tary mes­sen­ger hor­mone called the Thy­roid Sti­mu­la­ting Hor­mone (TSH).  The lab test does NOT mea­sure whether your tis­sue is recei­ving enough thy­roid hor­mone, which is why so many patients on T4 end up with depres­sion, rising cho­les­te­rol, high blood pres­sure, low B12, low ferri­tin and many symp­toms, as well as adre­nal fati­gue thanks to the ina­de­quate treat­ment of T4.
  3. Rai­sing T4 often encou­ra­ges an excess pro­duc­tion of Reverse T3 over time, which will block cell recep­tors and inc­rease the very symp­toms the researcher state is avoi­ded, as well as far more hypothy­roid symptoms.

But on the posi­tive side: this is just one more research study that ends up being on our side in our quest in teaching our doc­tors about far bet­ter treat­ment pro­to­cols. I have also inc­lu­ded men­tion of this study on the follo­wing page on STTM, where I keep a ongoing list of  research which sup­ports what patients already know by their expe­rience and cli­ni­cal pre­sen­ta­tion:  http://www.stopthethyroidmadness.com/medical-research/


  • Want to keep track of these “fringe web­site” blog posts? ;-) Curious what’s on Janie’s mind? Use the noti­fi­ca­tion on the lower left of the links, called a News­let­ter, or an RSS Feed.
  • The extre­mely hip and sophis­ti­ca­ted STTM t-shirts are half price! Great BUMPER STICKERS, too. Spread the word – YOU may make a dif­fe­rence in someone’s life.
  • Check out the patient-to-patient book with even more detail (and which doc­tors seem to res­pect more than websites).
  • Need to unders­tand all your best options for thy­roid treat­ment? Go here.
  • Keep infor­med of each live Thy­roid Patient Com­mu­nity Call on Talkshoe by sig­ning up as a follo­wer.

5 Responses to “Having lower TSH levels when taking thyroxine not unsafe, says recent research”

  1. Kara S said:

    Mar 19, 10 at 3:55 pm

    Hullo!

    Here’s a com­ment with medi­cal abs­tract urls that I’d writ­ten recently about sup­pres­sed TSH — which is how I func­tion best. Luc­kily, I found a doc who sup­ports me (and just to be sure, I’d prin­ted out these abs­tracts and taken them to our first meeting).

    Hope it helps someone — enjoy!
    Kara

    —-

    When I loo­ked into what endos/etc actually said about the nega­tive effects of a sup­pres­sed TSH, the only one I see men­tio­ned is OSTEOPOROSIS. That’s it, unless I’m mis­sing something. (And if I am, please do correct me.)
    .
    Howe­ver, many medi­cal research papers detail groups of patients who were pur­po­sely medi­ca­ted to sup­press TSH due to thy­roid can­cer; The papers show that these patients exhi­bit NO OSTEOPOROSIS, as long as they have not exhi­bi­ted phy­si­cal hyperthy­roid symp­toms (arryth­mia, tre­mors, etc). These patients were can­cer patients, since TSH sup­pres­sion is the com­mon treat­ment for that; howe­ver, the same fin­dings can be exten­ded to non-cancer patients.
    .
    In other words, THE ONLY WORRY ABOUT A SUPPRESSED TSH IS OSTEOPOROSIS, AND THAT DOES NOT OCCUR WHEN THE PATIENT DOES NOT EXHIBIT HYPERTHYRIOD SYMPTOMS.
    .
    Other papers point out that the TSH test was deve­lo­ped from a bell curve of “nor­mal” patients, and that any scien­tist will recog­nize that bell cur­ves have legi­ti­mate out­liers (peo­ple — like myself and many on these forums — whose per­fectly good num­bers hap­pen to fit on the tails of the bell curve). In other words, as you already know, high and low TSH’s can be per­fectly nor­mal for some peo­ple.
    .
    I had prin­ted out these abs­tracts and other web­si­tes in order to take them to my doc so he would hope­fully feel com­for­ta­ble dosing Armour to my symp­toms ins­tead of my TSH. (And yes, he is currently doing so, and we are kee­ping an eye on my bone den­sity, just to be sure.) With luck, they will be use­ful for others as well.
    .
    T4 Sup­pres­sion / Osteo­po­ro­sis — Ran­do­mi­zed trial of pami­dro­nate in patients with t… [J Clin Endoc­ri­nol Metab. 1998] — PubMed result
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9661603?dopt=Abstract
    .
    Lack of dele­te­rious effect on bone mine­ral den­sity… [Endocr Relat Can­cer. 2005] — PubMed result
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16322336?dopt=Abstract
    .
    Treat­ment of benign nodu­lar goi­tre with mildly sup… [J Intern Med. 2002] — PubMed result
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11982740?dopt=Abstract
    .
    Cli­ni­cal value of a sen­si­tive immu­no­ra­dio­me­tric as… [Ann Clin Biochem. 1985] — PubMed result
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/4062219?dopt=Abstract
    .
    Cali­for­nia Cen­ter for Pitui­tary Disor­ders at UCSF — Pitui­tary 101 — Pitui­tary Disor­ders — Hypothy­roi­dism
    http://ccpd.ucsf.edu/hypothyroidi.shtml
    .
    TSH and Patients’ Expe­rien­ces: Sup­pres­sed to 0.5 / Alt.Support.Thyroid News­group Web­site
    http://www.altsupportthyroid.org/tsh/tshexp1pr.php
    .
    MyThyroid.com: Osteo­po­ro­sis
    http://www.mythyroid.com/osteoporosis.html

  2. Eva M. O'Keefe said:

    Mar 19, 10 at 4:55 pm

    You have NO IDEA how much your web­site has hel­ped me.
    I was lite­rally dying on T4 only and having every symp­tom of adre­nal fati­gue. I switched to Natu­reth­roid (which is what I had to begin with before the shor­tage) and I am taking iso­cort.. I am a human being again..
    Thank you so much for your valua­ble research..
    I am buying the book shortly…
    Thank you,
    Eva

  3. Theresa said:

    Mar 23, 10 at 8:21 am

    I plan to print everything on this page to take to my doc­tor next visit. The repla­ce­ment doc­tor I saw last time had never seen such a low TSH test result (0.04). I had a bone mine­ral den­sity test last year, just before I tur­ned 50, and the result was that my bones are 20 (thanks to desic­ca­ted thy­roid and it’s con­tai­ned cal­ci­to­nin)! I use milk pro­ducts semi-regularly, and rarely sup­ple­ment with cal­cium, so we know where the cre­dit lies! The doc­tor orde­red the test due to very low, out of nor­mal range TSH (con­sis­tently in the range of 0.03 — 0.04), which always seems to freak him out. Sadly, I’m still cold, fat, and not very ener­ge­tic, but I’m awai­ting the results of a 4-point cor­ti­sol saliva test to deter­mine my adre­nal sta­tus. If the stress of living 20 years with hypothy­roi­dism alone didn’t stress my adre­nals, then rai­sing 3 tee­na­gers and dea­ling with my husband’s trau­ma­tic brain injury from a long fall onto a conc­rete floor 9 years ago cer­tainly con­tri­bu­ted. (He’s fine, even more a wor­kaho­lic than ever before!)

  4. Dr. Swerdloff said:

    Mar 25, 10 at 2:15 am

    USC did a study that found that the upper limit of TSH was way off and published it in the Jour­nal of Endoc­ri­no­logy 2003 where they found that a TSH of >= to 2.4(not 4.5 – 5 as was pre­viously thought) was already asso­cia­ted with thy­roid disease of some sort either nodu­les or Hashimoto’s disease. So I would ven­ture to hypothe­size that the lower limit of the range is also inco­rrect by at least the same amount. It would be nice to see some research in that direc­tion as well. Remem­ber Dr. Thiery Hertoghe’s great grand­father Dr. Eugene Her­toghe desc­ri­bed hypothy­roi­dism as a set of cli­ni­cal signs and symp­toms( inc­lu­ding the “Her­toghe Sign of Low Thy­roid the loss of the late­ral 1/3 of the eye­brow”) (not as a lab con­di­tion) that impro­ved with admi­nis­tra­tion of thy­roid. It wasn’t till many years later that labs deter­mi­ned that there were four thy­roid hor­mo­nes and that T4 was the most pre­va­lent. The makers of Synth­roid equa­ted the most pre­va­lent to most impor­tant, little did they know that T4 is simi­lar to pro-insulin in its low acti­vity and that if an indi­vi­dual doesn’t have enough of the Thy­roid Pero­xi­dase Enzyme because of Hashimoto’s disease they will not easily be able to cleave off the iodide and make active T3 which is more easily assi­mi­la­ted by the brain and the rest of the body and will ulti­ma­tely exhi­bit symp­toms of low thyroid.

  5. Jolie said:

    Mar 25, 10 at 7:04 am

    I find it’s best not to lis­ten to Bri­tish thy­roid ‘experts’. They see­mingly don’t have the first idea what they are talkng about!


Leave a Reply


Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!